Polygraph examiners who work for law enforcement hiring have experienced shocking confessions that have altered their perception of crimes forever. Pre-employment polygraph screening serves as a final checkpoint before unsuitable candidates can potentially come to police departments across the country. These examinations have continuously uncovered horrifying criminal histories that applicants tried to conceal throughout their entire hiring process. Furthermore, polygraph examiners tell me they have made shocking admissions during these screening tests about the importance of the profound meaning of vetting. In particular, candidates will repeatedly confess to serious violent felonies in the presence of polygraph examinations. Therefore, knowing these eight heinous admissions shows how polygraph examiners ensure public safety with rigid screening protocols. Additionally, these revelations attest to the critical importance of polygraph examinations in screening out dangerous people in law enforcement jobs.
Table of Contents
What Polygraph Examination Discovered: Eight Heinous Admissions
Polygraph examiners for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency reported more than 200 major criminal admissions from fiscal years 2013 to 2016. Investigative journalists conducted research that revealed truly disturbing confessions during these screening processes. Moreover, applicants made these admissions while they were undergoing routine pre-employment polygraph examinations. Therefore, by investigating these eight categories, we can find systematic features of hidden criminal activities by police applicants. These results fundamentally challenge the assumptions of the effectiveness of law enforcement candidate screening.
- First, admissions of murder shocked the polygraph examiners around the country. Border protection applicants admitted to participating in homicides during their pre-employment screening processes. Furthermore, some candidates admitted that they participated in unsolved murders from years before. Additionally, polygraph examiners said about 4 percent of applicants confessed to crimes involving murder. Therefore, these admissions demonstrate that background checks of this type are often lacking in catching serious violent felonies. As a result, polygraph examinations are important safeguards to identify truly dangerous people.
- Second, rape confessions kept cropping up during examinations. One of the examination summaries recorded applicants charged with sexual assault offenses. Moreover, some 34 percent of applicants confessed to committing rape during polygraph exams. Furthermore, some of the candidates confessed to gang rape of more than one victim. Therefore, polygraph examiners proved that sexual predators have a high interest in working for law enforcement. In addition, these admissions illustrate why polygraph screening is still important to keep communities safe.
- Third was armed robbery admissions, which was another common category. Polygraph examiners recorded that some 38 percent of the job applicants confessed to committing armed robberies. Furthermore, several candidates admitted to committing several robbery crimes against commercial establishments. Therefore, aggressive criminals trying to get badges created a real risk when hiring. Moreover, polygraph examiners found patterns that indicated that some violent criminals deliberately applied for places in law enforcement.
- Fourth, the confessions by drug smugglers greatly alarmed federal investigators. Applicants admitted to actively smuggling controlled substances across the borders. Furthermore, some of the candidates acknowledged that there continued to be drug trafficking operations. In addition, these admissions showed that the drug dealers made a concerted effort to infiltrate law enforcement agencies. Therefore, polygraph examiners refused to allow criminal organizations to infiltrate government agencies with operatives.
- Fifth, concerning the admissions of human trafficking, these admissions revealed disturbing exploitation crimes. Candidates confessed to being involved in the trafficking of human victims for forced labor and sexual exploitation. In addition, some of the applicants confessed to having been involved in organized trafficking networks. Furthermore, polygraph examiners identified the perpetrators of human trafficking as actively seeking law enforcement employment. Therefore, the following admissions raised the need for comprehensive polygraph screening protocols.
- Sixth, the confessions of kidnapping and extortion were serious violent crimes. One notorious confession was that of applicants who had confessed to kidnapping and ransoming hostages in African countries. Furthermore, examiners of polygraph machines claimed that candidates confessed to extortion schemes against vulnerable individuals. Therefore, these violent criminals posed extreme threats to public safety if agencies hired them.
- Seventh, child sexual abuse admissions headed the list of the most disturbing categories. Polygraph examiners witnessed that the applicants confessed to child molestation, possession of pornography, and underage exploitation crimes. Furthermore, some of the candidates admitted to ongoing inappropriate contact with minors. Therefore, these admissions showed that the sexual predators strategically sought law enforcement jobs that offered a way to access children. In addition, polygraph screening kept potential child predators from getting jobs of authority.
- Eighth, terrorist-related admissions scared federal security officials the most. One applicant famously confessed to thinking about assassinating the president as he prepared to fight high-tech survival. Furthermore, other candidates admitted having ideological affiliations with terrorist organizations. Therefore, polygraph examinations found security threats before they infiltrated federal agencies.
Why Polygraph Examiners Are Still Necessary In Police Hiring
Polygraph examiners can work as the ultimate barriers to protect the integrity of law enforcement and to keep communities protected. Without rigorous polygraph screening, an estimated 2,300 applicants during one 4-year period would have joined law enforcement agencies despite having serious disqualifying criminal histories. Furthermore, research has shown that states that require polygraph screening have far fewer incidents of officer misconduct than states that prohibit polygraph screening. Additionally, polygraph examiners identify unsuitable candidates whom standard background investigations completely miss. Therefore, continuing strict polygraph procedures has kept criminals in badges away from communities.
Key Takeaways from Protecting Your Community through Thorough Screening
Polygraph examiners have exposed the fact that law enforcement applicants often cover up serious violent crimes during the hiring process. Furthermore, eight categories of heinous admissions prove that there are systematic criminal infiltration attempts inside the police departments. Additionally, polygraph screening deters dangerous people from getting authority posts. Therefore, communities should be supportive of mandatory polygraph examination requirements for all law enforcement applicants. In addition, knowing these shocking admissions highlights why this in-depth investigative screening can have an astonishing effect on public safety.
Concerned about background investigation? Our seasoned California private investigators specialize in proactive, in-depth candidate screening, as well as background verification and support of investigations. We find information that standard checks miss. Contact our private intelligence staff today to book private investigator services in Oklahoma, (405)-435-8355, or email Vivien at Makayla@ojpslegal.com for our complete investigation services that will protect your organization.
